The Standeford Journal - News, Intel Analysis

The Standeford Journal - News, Intel Analysis

North America

U.S. Declassifies Seismic Evidence Confirming Lop Nur Nuclear Explosion In 2020

U.S. analysts estimate a yield of approximately 10 tons nuclear (or 5 tons conventional equivalent), assuming the blast was fully contained in solid rock.

Donald Standeford's avatar
Donald Standeford
Feb 27, 2026
∙ Paid

GLOBAL — U.S. officials have publicly detailed intelligence assessing a seismic event near China’s Lop Nur nuclear test site on June 22, 2020, as a low-yield nuclear explosion.

photo for illustration purposes only

Share

China Conducts Magnesium Hydride Non-Nuclear Explosive Test

China Conducts Magnesium Hydride Non-Nuclear Explosive Test

Donald Standeford
·
April 21, 2025
Read full story
U.S. Nuclear Arsenal Claims Amid Global Developments and Projections

U.S. Nuclear Arsenal Claims Amid Global Developments and Projections

Donald Standeford
·
November 2, 2025
Read full story
China, Russia Test Launch ICBMs. Satellite Shows Russian Test Failed And Exploded, Left Large Crater

China, Russia Test Launch ICBMs. Satellite Shows Russian Test Failed And Exploded, Left Large Crater

Donald Standeford
·
September 26, 2024
Read full story

More Space/Nuclear Reports

The assessment relies on waveform data from Primary Seismic Station 23 (PS-23) at Makanchi, Kazakhstan, part of the International Monitoring System, a global network of sensors designed to detect nuclear tests.

Refer a friend

A magnitude 2.75 event was recorded at 09:18 Greenwich Mean Time. Seismic signals showed a short, sharp pressure wave (Pn) — the kind produced by a sudden energy release like an explosion — and no side-to-side shaking energy (Lg) that natural earthquakes normally produce at the expected time.

Historical Lop Nur earthquakes exhibit long, emergent Pn waves and clear Lg shear phases. The 2020 event’s waveform matched explosion signatures in official U.S. comparisons.

U.S. analysts estimate a yield of approximately 10 tons nuclear (or 5 tons conventional equivalent), assuming the blast was fully contained in solid rock — meaning all energy transferred into the ground rather than being absorbed by softer material.

If the test was conducted in a way that dampened the seismic signal (decoupling), the actual yield would be higher than the estimate.

The Standeford Journal - News, Intel Analysis is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Seismic Waveform Comparison

User's avatar

Continue reading this post for free, courtesy of Donald Standeford.

Or purchase a paid subscription.
© 2026 Donald Standeford · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture